Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :575
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate here
  Next article
  Previous article 
  Table of Contents
Resource links
   Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
   Article in PDF (38 KB)
   Citation Manager
   Access Statistics
   Reader Comments
   Email Alert *
   Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded287    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2008  |  Volume : 45  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 182

Defining age cut off age for "Young patients" with breast cancer

1 Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, India
2 Department of Pathology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, India

Correspondence Address:
V Anuradha
Department of Pathology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.44670

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Reddy C O, Anuradha V, Mukherjee G, Bapsy P P. Defining age cut off age for "Young patients" with breast cancer. Indian J Cancer 2008;45:182

How to cite this URL:
Reddy C O, Anuradha V, Mukherjee G, Bapsy P P. Defining age cut off age for "Young patients" with breast cancer. Indian J Cancer [serial online] 2008 [cited 2022 Dec 7];45:182. Available from:

Dear Sir,

Breast cancer that develops at a young age is different from that arising in older menopausal patients. These differences are attribute to the faster tumor growth, [represented by the short doubling time], expression of markers of metastatic potential like MMP2, and high levels of markers for the drug resistance. [1] On the other hand, there have been earlier reports that suggested that there was no significant difference in outcome between younger, versus older women with breast cancer. [1],[2] However, the weight of literature appears to support generally worse behavior in breast cancer in younger women. The question that was overlooked by many was "the age cut off". Majority of the literature suggest that patients younger than 40 are considered as the young patients. This assumption was achieved based on the earlier reports stating that the women under 40 are unlikely to achieve menopause after chemotherapy, and the benefit in Hormone receptor positive patients was less. [3] However, as the mean age of the patients with breast cancer in India is almost 5 years less than that of the western world, [4] the same might not be true across the globe. The Indian data too suggest a relatively worse prognosis from the western Indians and no/little differences from the reports of Adayar cancer institute. The careful review suggested that in studies where the cut off age of 40 years was chosen, the difference was not as pronounced as it was observed in those studies where cut off age was chosen as 35. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6] Probably the only study that addressed this issue was by OJ et al , who also found on multivariate analysis, that age <35 years was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of loco regional recurrence even when compared to those who were between 35 and 40. The five-year rate of loco regional control was 87.9% in patients <35 years old compared with 91.7% in patients 35 to 40 years old ( P = 0.042). [5] Similarly the systematic review of various studies yielded similar results. In the results published in a recent conference in the metastatic setting, which suggested that younger patients have a worse disease course, even matching for the other known prognostic variables. [6]

  References Top

1.Anders CK, Hsu DS, Broadwater G, Acharya CR, Foekens JA, Zhang Y, et al . Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3324-30.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Khanfir A, Frikha M, Kallel F, Meziou M, Trabelsi K, Boudawara T, et al . Breast cancer in young women in the south of Tunisia. Cancer Radiother 2006;10:565-71.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
3.Pagani O, O'Neill A, Castiglione M, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Rudenstam CM, et al . Prognostic impact of amenorrhoea after adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement: Results of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial VI. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:632-40.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
4.Population based cancer registry India 2004. Report No. 6 2004.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Oh JL, Bonnen M, Outlaw ED, Schechter NR, Perkins GH, Strom EA, et al . The impact of young age on locooregional recurrence after doxorubicin-based breast conservation therapy in patients 40 years old or younger: How young is "young"? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006:65:1345-52.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Jain A, Attili VS, Bapsy PP. Prognostic variables in metastatic breast cancer: Is there an age differential? Eur J Cancer Suppl 1969;5:223.  Back to cited text no. 6    

This article has been cited by
1 Differential diagnosis of lung nodules: Breast cancer metastases and lung tuberculosis
Endri, M., Cartei, G., Zustovich, F., Serino, F.S., Fassina, A.
Infezioni in Medicina. 2010; 18(1): 39-42


Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article


  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer | Privacy Notice
  Online since 1st April '07
  2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow