Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :362
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate Here
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded121    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2021  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 210-216

Factors affecting survival in glioblastoma patients below and above 65 years of age: A retrospective observational study

Department of Radiation Oncology, Meram Medical School, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Berrin B Yavuz
Department of Radiation Oncology, Meram Medical School, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_36_19

Rights and Permissions

Background: The purpose of this study is to identify the differences with respect to survival and prognostic factors in a comparison between radiotherapy-receiving glioblastoma (GBM) patients above and below 65 years of age. Methods: The results of 157 patients with GBM were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups as those below and above 65 years of age. A comparison was drawn with respect to each group's demographic characteristics, treatment methods, and findings. Results: Out of a total of 157 patients, 53 patients (33.8%) were above 65 years of age. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was weaker among older patients (P = 0.002). On the other hand, with respect to radiotherapy dose, among older patient group, greater hypofractionation and whole-brain radiotherapy was applied (P = 0.003) compared with younger patients. The survival rates for 1, 2, and 5 years among patients aged <65 years were 63%, 30%, and 3%, respectively, and in patients aged ≥65 years were 43%, 13%, and 0%, respectively. In univariate analyses, a comparison between patients below and above 65 years of age revealed that values higher than 80 KPS (P = 0.002), applying total excision (P < 0.001), receiving concurrent chemotherapy (P = 0.004), receiving conventional radiotherapy (P < 0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001) were effective factors on overall survival rates. Conclusion: In the patient group above 65 years of age, the patient should be attentively selected before opting for a specific treatment, age alone should not be the sole determinant factor. Rather, by considering the KPS scores, potential aggressive treatment options should also be applied.


Print this article     Email this article

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer | Privacy Notice
  Online since 1st April '07
  © 2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow