utd_medknow
Indian Journal of Cancer
Home  ICS  Feedback Subscribe Top cited articles Login 
Users Online :408
Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Navigate here
  Search
 
  Ahead of print
  
Resource links
    Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Sahinli H
    -  Akyürek N
    -  Yılmaz M
    -  Kandemir O
    -  Duran AO
    -  Kulaçoğlu S
    -  Uçar G
    -  Acar E
    -  Özet A
    -  Gümüş M
    -  Ç. Öksüzoğlu &B
    -  Özdemir NY

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Patients and Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1024    
    PDF Downloaded32    

Recommend this journal

 

Previous Article  Table of Contents  Next Article
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of print publication
 

PD-L1 expression in immune cells is a favorable prognostic factor for nasopharyngeal carcinoma


1 Department of Oncology, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
2 Department of Pathology, Gazi University Medical Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
3 Department of Oncology, Gazi University Medical University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
4 Department of Pathology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
5 Department of Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
6 Department of Pathology, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
7 Department of Oncology, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
8 Department of Oncology, Medical School of Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey

Date of Submission21-May-2019
Date of Decision14-Jun-2019
Date of Acceptance23-Mar-2020
Date of Web Publication10-Dec-2020

Correspondence Address:
Hayriye Sahinli,
Department of Oncology, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_459_19

PMID: 33402600

  Abstract 


Background: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been determined as a reliable prognostic factor for various malignancies. In this study, we aimed to determine the prognostic effect of PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.
Methods: Seventy patients diagnosed with non-metastatic NPC were included in the study. PD-L1 expression on immune cells was analyzed by immunohistochemical method. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the PD-L1 expression level in TIICs (level of PD-L1 staining ≥5% positive vs <5% negative).
Results: Median follow-up period was 34 months (range = 1 - 188). 1 and 2 years survival rate were found as 75% and 63% in PD-L1 negative TIICs group (47%), and 85% and 83% in PD-L1 positive TIICs group (53%), respectively. PD-L1 positivity in immune cells (ICs) was detected in 53% of the patients. The survival rate was found better in the PD- L1 positive group compared to the negative group (P = 0.049).
Discussion: In conclusion, the survival rate was found significantly better in the PD-L1 positive TIICs group, compared to the negative group.


Keywords: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, prognosis, programmed death ligand-1
Key Message PD-L1 expression in immune cells can be used as a good prognostic marker in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.



How to cite this URL:
Sahinli H, Akyürek N, Yılmaz M, Kandemir O, Duran AO, Kulaçoğlu S, Uçar G, Acar E, Özet A, Gümüş M, Ç. Öksüzoğlu &B, Özdemir NY. PD-L1 expression in immune cells is a favorable prognostic factor for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Indian J Cancer [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2021 Jul 27]. Available from: https://www.indianjcancer.com/preprintarticle.asp?id=302938





  Introduction Top


Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated tumor originating from the epithelial surface of the nasopharynx with different etiology and geographic distribution. The annual incidence in endemic areas such as Southern China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan has reached up to 25–50/100000. It is estimated that 50,000 deaths are observed worldwide annually.[1] Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is chemosensitive carcinoma and, the 5-year survival rate is 80% in patients with stage I and II disease, whereas it is less than 10% in stage IV disease.[2]

Although it is sensitive to chemotherapy, resistance may develop; therefore, new treatments are needed.[3],[4]

Significant immune infiltrates are observed in primary tumor tissue of patients with NPC consisting of T-cells, B-cells, dendritic cells, monocytes, and eosinophils.[5],[6],[7],[8] Programmed death-1 (PD-1) is an immunosuppressive receptor expressed on T-cells. T-cell activation decreases after binding of the PD1 ligand (PD-L1) to PD-1 causing tumor immune escape.[9],[10] PD-L1 is expressed on antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells and macrophages and, tumor cells.[11]

The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays an important role in the cancer-specific immune response. The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) CD8 is known to be a predictive marker in response to anti-PD-1 therapy in solid tumors.[12],[13] There is a positive correlation between positive PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells and the number of tumor-infiltrating immune cells such as CD4 T-lymphocytes and CD8 T-lymphocytes.[14],[15]

Previous studies focused exclusively on PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. However, recent studies revealed that PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells plays an important role in tumor immune escape.[16],[17],[18],[19] Those studies demonstrated that PD-L1 expression in immune cells may be used as a prognostic biomarker and may also provide more information on responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Mention companion diagnostic of PD-L1 count of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

In this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between PD-L1 expression in immune cells and prognosis in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.


  Patients and Methods Top


Seventy nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients diagnosed via tumor biopsy between January 2008 and December 2016 were included in this study. This is a multi-center study. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were obtained from the first biopsy specimens. Age, gender, tumor stage, tumor histology, and smoking history of the patients were obtained from registered files of patients. This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ankara Numune Teaching Hospital.

Immunohistochemical method

Immunohistochemical staining was performed 4 μm-sections obtained from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue of nasopharyngeal biopsies or excision specimens of the tumor with the antibody anti-PD-L1 (SP263 Ventana Medical Systems) using the standard protocol for routine diagnostic specimens. The percentage of positive immune cells (ICs) for PD-L1 was evaluated.

Meanwhile, ICs in which the membrane or cytoplasm was immunostained at ≥5% staining intensity were considered positive for PD-L1. The majority of PD-L1 positive ICs were macrophages and lymphocytes—(Natural killer cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts,vascular endothelial cells). All immune cells were evaluated. Immune cells were quantified by evaluating the ratio of the area covered by stained ICs to the tumor area (IC scores), as described in previous reports.[20],[21] The necrotic areas were excluded from the scoring area. Negative reagent controls were evaluated in each case by confirming the acceptable level of background staining. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay was considered positive if ≥5% of immune cells were stained [Figure 1].
Figure 1: High level of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in a biopsy of a nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient. PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is also present. (IHC, ×200)

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

The relationship between PD-L1 expression in immune cells and clinicopathological characteristics was evaluated by Pearson's X2 test. The association of demographic, clinical and histopathological parameters with a prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma were evaluated. Survival curves were depicted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was done with factors that may affect survival. Overall survival (OS) of patients following treatment was calculated by considering all death events. All analyses were performed with SPSS 20 version program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


Seventy patients with nonmetastatic NPC were included in the study. The median was 52 years (18-76 years). 14 patients were female, and 56 patients were male. The median follow-up period was 34 months (1–188 months). During follow-up, 31.4% (n = 22) of the patients died. The 2-year survival rate was 80%. Median OS was not reached. 1 and 2-year survival rates were 75% and 63% in PD-L1 negative ICs group; 85% and 83% in PD-L1 positive ICs group, respectively. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) positivity in immune cells was detected in 53% (n = 37) of the patients.

The relationship between PD-L1 expression in immune cells and clinicopathological characteristics (age, sex, smoking history, histology, treatment, and TNM stage) was evaluated in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. No significant relationship was found between the level of PD-L1 in immune cells and clinicopathological characteristics [Table 1].
Table 1: Associations between PD-L1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Click here to view


The relationship between clinicopathological variables and survival was analyzed with log-rank test. No significant relationship was found between survival and age (<50 years vs ≥50 years; P = 0.332), gender (male vs female; P = 0.260), smoking status (smoking vs. no smoking; P = 0.762), N stage (N0/1 vs N2/3; P = 0.564), pathology (differentiated vs undifferentiated; P = 0.256), stage (1/2 vs 3/4; P = 0,206), and type of therapy (radiotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy; P = 0.702). A significant relationship was found between survival rate and T-stage (T 1/2/3 vs 4; P = 0.009) [Table 2].
Table 2: Univariate analysis to assess the association of clinical parameters with prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Click here to view


Results of Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test demonstrated that survival was significantly better in PD-L1 positive immune cell group compared to the PD-L1 negative group (P = 0.049) [Table 2] and [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier survival curve for PD-L1 expression in tumor infiltrating-immune cell

Click here to view


T stage (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.250, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.084–0.748; P = 0.013) and PD-L1 positivity of immune cells (HR = 0.328, 95%CI: 0.122–0.881; P = 0.027) were found as independent factors affecting prognosis by performing multivariate Cox regression analysis [Table 3].
Table 3: Multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrating relationship between some variables and survival

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Immunotherapy is an effective treatment strategy for head and neck tumors. Therefore, the specification of immune-related biomarkers is important. Although the association of TILs such as CD3 and CD8 with prognosis is known in patients with head and neck cancer, most of the immune-related biomarkers are unknown. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells has been shown to be a predictive marker in response to anti-PD1/PD-L1 treatment in many studies.[22]

Also, PD-L1 expression has been shown to be a good prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer and Merkel cell carcinoma while it was shown as a negative prognostic factor in many types of cancer such as kidney, colorectal and lung cancer.[18],[23],[24] In a study of patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, the presence of PD-L1 expression and abundance of TILs were found to be independent good prognostic factors.[25]

In a meta-analysis, the risk of death has been shown to decrease in patients with positive PD- L1 expression in tumor-infiltrated immune cells (HR = 0.784, 95% Cl: 0.616–0.997, P = 0.047).[26] In a study by Kim et al. in patients with head and neck cancer, patients with PD-L1 positivity in ICs had significantly better 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) (80.1% vs 69.7%) and OS (90.6% vs 75.6%) compared to PD-L1 negative patients.[27] Patients with oral cavity and oropharynx tumors were included in this study by Kim et al. In a study by Badoual et al. conducted in patients with head and neck cancer, better survival was detected in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and expressing a high level of PD-L1 in T-cells compared to those expressing a low level of PD-L1.[28] In a study of patients with urothelial carcinoma, the relationship between PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells and survival was evaluated; and survival rate was found better in urothelial carcinoma patients with PD-L1 positive ICs.[25] In another study conducted in patients with NPC, no significant relationship was found between PD-L1 in immune cells and OS (P = 0.278) and DFS (P = 0.290).[29] There is a strong relationship between tumor-infiltrating immune cells expressing PD-L1 and cancer immune response. There is a positive correlation between positive PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells and the number of TILs such as CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes in various tumors. Survival was found better in cancer patients with a high level of CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes in studies.[14],[15] TILs play a crucial role in host immune response to the tumor, and may reveal the antitumor immune response. In a study conducted in patients with melanoma, patients with a high level of TILs in the tumor tissue were found to have better survival and the risk of metastasis was found to be lower.[30] Although the expression of PD-L1 mediates the immune escape in cancer, it implies an effective immune response, particularly in the early stage of cancer.[31]

Diverse cut-off values were defined for PD-L1 in studies. In many studies, the immunohistochemical cutoff value for positive PD-L1 expression was determined as >5% and >1% of immune cells.[26] In our study, we defined the cut-off value for PD-L1 expression on >5% of immune cells. In this study, the PD-L1 positivity rate in TIICs was 53%. PD-L1 positivity rate in tumor-infiltrating immune cells was found as 46.8% in a previous study of NPC patients. In our study, a similar rate was found. A standard cut-off value is required to use PD-L1 expression in immune cells as a good prognostic marker.

The limitations of our study are small sample size and retrospective design. More prospective studies are needed with a larger number of patients.


  Conclusion Top


A significant relationship was found between survival and positive PD-L1 expression in ICs in patients with NPC. The survival of patients with PD-L1 positive in ICs was significantly better than the negative ones. PD-L1 expression in ICs may be used as a good prognostic factor and may be useful for selecting patients who may respond to anti PD- L1 therapy as well.

Financial support and sponsorship

Antibodies used in this study were supplied by Bristol-Myers Squibb (Istanbul, Turkey).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 2015;1:505-27.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Jin Y, Shi YX, Cai XY, Xia XY, Cai YC, Cao Y, et al. Comparison of five cisplatin-based regimens frequently used as the first-line protocols in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2012;138:1717-25.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri PG, Fu KK, Cooper J, Vuong T, et al. Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: Phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099. J Clin Oncol1998;16:1310-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wee J, Tan EH, Tai BC, Wong HB, Leong SS, Tan T, et al. Randomized trial of radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer stage III and IV nasopharyngeal cancer of the endemic variety. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6730-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Busson P, Braham K, Ganem G, Thomas F, Grausz D, Lipinski M, et al. Epstein-Barr virus-containing epithelial cells from nasopharyngeal carcinoma produce interleukin 1 alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987;84:6262-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Huang YT, Sheen TS, Chen CL, Lu J, Chang Y, Chen JY, et al. Profile of cytokine expression in nasopharyngeal carcinomas: A distinct expression of interleukin 1 in tumor and CD4+T cells. Cancer Res1999;59:1599-605.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Tang KF, Tan SY, Chan SH, Chong SM, Loh KS, Tan LK, et al. A distinct expression of CC chemokines by macrophages in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Implication for the intense tumor infiltration by T lymphocytes and macrophages. Hum Pathol 2001;32:42-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Teichmann M, Meyer B, Beck A, Niedobitek G. Expression of the interferon-inducible chemokine IP-10 (CXCL10), a chemokine with proposed anti-neoplastic functions, in Hodgkin lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Pathol 2005;206:68-75.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Fife BT, Pauken KE, Eagar TN, Obu T, Wu J, Tang Q, et al. Interactions between PD-1 and PD-L1 promote tolerance by blocking the TCR-induced stop signal. Nat Immunol 2009;10:1185-92.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Carreno BM, Collins M. The B7 family of ligands and its receptors: New pathways for costimulation and inhibition of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol 2002;20:29-53.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Herbst RS, Soria JC, Kowanetz M, Fine GD, Hamid O, Gordon MS, et al. Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature 2014;515:563-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Teng MW, Ngiow SF, Ribas A, Smyth MJ. Classifying cancers based on T-cell Infiltration and PD-L1. Cancer Res 2015;75:2139-45.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ock CY, Keam B, Kim S, Lee JS, Kim M, Kim TM, et al. Pan-cancer immunogenomic perspective on the tumor microenvironment based on PD-L1 and CD8 T-cell infiltration. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:2261-70.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Zeng DQ, Yu YF, Ou QY, Li XY, Zhong RZ, Xie CM, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of TILs for clinical therapeutic research in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2016;7:13765-81.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hwang WT, Adams SF, Tahirovic E, Hagemann IS, Coukos G. Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating T cells in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:192-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Paiva B, Azpilikueta A, Puig N, Ocio EM, Sharma R, Oyajobi BO, et al. PD-L1/PD-1 presence in the tumor microenvironment and activity of PD-1 blockade in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2015;29:2110-3.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Koirala P, Roth ME, Gill J, Piperdi S, Chinai JM, Geller DS, et al. Immune infiltration and PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment are prognostic in osteosarcoma. Sci Rep 2016;6:30093.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kawazoe A, Kuwata T, Kuboki Y, Shitara K, Nagatsuma AK, Aizawa M, et al. Clinicopathological features of programmed death ligand 1 expression with tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte, mismatch repair, and Epstein-Barr virus status in a large cohort of gastric cancer patients. Gastric Cancer 2017;20:407-15.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Saito R, Abe H, Kunita A, Yamashita H, Seto Y, Fukayama M. Overexpression and gene amplification of PD-L1 in cancer cells and PD-L1(+) immune cells in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer: The prognostic implications. Mod Pathol 2017;30:427-39.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Schats KA, Van Vre EA, Boeckx C, De Bie M, Schrijvers DM, Neyns B, et al. Optimal evaluation of programmed death ligand-1 on tumor cells versus immune cells requires different detection methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:982-91.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kerr KM, Hirsch FR. Programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry: Friend or foe? Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140:326-31.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Tie Y, Ma X, Zhu C, Mao Y, Shen K, Wei X, et al. Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in the treatment of cancers: A meta-analysis of 27 prospective clinical trials. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:948-58.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Boger C, Behrens HM, Mathiak M, Kruger S, Kalthoff H, Rocken C. PD-L1 is an independent prognostic predictor in gastric cancer of Western patients. Oncotarget 2016;7:24269-83.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Choueiri TK, Fay AP, Gray KP, Callea M, Ho TH, Albiges L, et al. PD-L1 expression in nonclear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2014;25:2178-84.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Bellmunt J, Mullane SA, Werner L, Fay AP, Callea M, Leow JJ, et al. Association of PD-L1 expression on tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells and overall survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2015;26:812-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Zhao T, Li C, Wu Y, Li B, Zhang B. Prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in tumor infiltrating immune cells in cancers: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0176822.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Kim HR, Ha SJ, Hong MH, Heo SJ, Koh YW, Choi EC, et al. PD-L1 expression on immune cells, but not on tumor cells, is a favorable prognostic factor for head and neck cancer patients. Sci Rep 2016;6:36956.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Badoual C, Hans S, Merillon N, Van Ryswick C, Ravel P, Benhamouda N, et al. PD-1-expressing tumor-infiltrating T cells are a favorable prognostic biomarker in HPV-associated head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 2013;73:128-38.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Zhu Q, Cai MY, Chen CL, Hu H, Lin HX, Li M, et al. Tumor cells PD-L1 expression as a favorable prognosis factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with pre-existing intratumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Oncoimmunology 2017;6:e1312240.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Clemente CG, Mihm MC Jr, Bufalino R, Zurrida S, Collini P, Cascinelli N. Prognostic value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in the vertical growth phase of primary cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 1996;77:1303-10.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Yang CY, Lin MW, Chang YL, Wu CT, Yang PC. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression is associated with a favourable immune microenvironment and better overall survival in stage I pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2016;57:91-103.  Back to cited text no. 31
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Previous Article  Next Article

    

  Site Map | What's new | Copyright and Disclaimer
  Online since 1st April '07
  2007 - Indian Journal of Cancer | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow